Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
An Examination of Bipartisanship in the United States Congress on Environmental Policy:
  • The Superfund Program &
  • The Clean Air Act – 1980-1990
2
Introduction
  • “All politics is local”
    • U.S. Congressman Tipp O’Neill
    •         (D-Massachusetts)

  • “Environmental protection and economic growth are not mutually exclusive”
    • U.S. Senator Joseph Lieberman
    •         (D-Connecticut)
3
Introduction – Continued
  • 1970’s – ‘Environmental Decade’


  • Quantitative Assessment of the Degree of Bipartisanship Within Congress for the Superfund Program (1980) and Clean Air Amendments (1990)
4
Background Legislative Measures in Place
  • National Environmental Protection Act (1969)


  • Clean Air Act (1970) – Amended in 1977


  • Clean Water Act (1972)


  • Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (1970)
5
Objectives
  • Quantitative Comparison of the Political Climate that Spawned the Superfund in 1980 to the Clean Air Amendments in 1990


  • Quantitative Assessment of the Degree of Bipartisanship Within Congress, Driven by Parochial Interests


  • Examination of Two Similar Congressional Districts With Different Representation (Democrat and Republican) to Assess Parochial Interests
6
Methods/Materials
  • Examination of Roll Call Votes of the United States House of Representatives and Senate (Ninety-Sixth and One-Hundred and First Congress)




  • Assessment of Related Congressional Districts Represented by Members of Opposing Political Parties (Democrats and Republicans)
7
Methods/Materials – Continued
  • Analysis of Ratings Administered by the Nonpartisan League of Conservation Voters to Assess Bipartisanship



  • Examination of Overall Political Contributions by Environmental Interested Political Action Committee’s
8
The 1980’s: The Superfund Program
(Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act – CERCLA)
  • Enacted on December 11th, 1980 – Provides Authority to Respond to Releases of Hazardous Wastes and for the Cleanup of Subsequent Sites


  • Introduced and Sponsored by Congressman James Joseph Florio (D-New Jersey)
9
Results of Assessment – Superfund Program
  • House of Representatives:


    • 63% of the 435 Members Voted in Favor of the Superfund Program


    • Roll Call Votes by Party Affiliation:


      • 196 Democrats and 78 Republican Yea Votes
      • 39 Democrats and 55 Republican Nay Votes
10
Results of Assessment – Superfund Program – Continued
11
Results of Assessment – Superfund Program – Continued
  • Case Study One: Pennsylvania Republicans


    • Fifteenth Congressional District:
      • Congressman Don Ritter (R)
      • Southeastern Pennsylvania – Lehigh and Northampton Counties
      • Urban and Suburban District



    • Fifth Congressional District:
      • Congressman Dick Schulze (R)
      • Central Pennsylvania – Tioga, Potter, and Elk Counties
      • Rural District
12
Results of Assessment – Superfund Program – Continued
13
Results of Assessment – Superfund Program – Continued
  • Case Study Two: Democratic District vs. Republican District


    • Pennsylvania Fifteenth Congressional District:
      • Congressman Don Ritter (Republican)
      • City of Allentown Population: 103,758
      • Industries: Mack Trucks, Western Electric (now Lucent Technologies), and Bethlehem Steel


    • Connecticut Third Congressional District:
      • Congressman Robert N. Giaimo (Democrat)
      • City of New Haven Population: 126,089
      • Industry: Sikorsky Aircraft
14
Results of Assessment – Superfund Program – Continued
15
1990: The Clean Air Amendments
  • Enacted on November 15th, 1990 – Provides for the Attainment and Maintenance of National Ambient Air Quality Standards as well as Subsequent Improvements


  • Introduced and Sponsored by Senator Max Baucus (D-Montana) and Congressman John D. Dingell (D-Michigan)


16
Results of Assessment – Clean Air Amendments
  • House of Representatives:


    • 92% of the 435 Members Voted for the Clean Air Amendments


    • Roll Call Votes by Party Affiliation:
      • 247 Democrats and 154 Republican Yea Votes
      • 5 Democrats and 16 Republican Nay Votes
17
Results of Assessment – Clean Air Amendments – Continued
18
Results of Assessment – Clean Air Amendments – Continued
  • Senate:


    • 89% of the 100 Members of the Senate Voted for the Clean Air Amendments


    • Roll Call Votes by Party Affiliation:
      • 50 Democrats and 39 Republican Yea Votes
      • 5 Democrats and 5 Republican Nay Votes

19
Results of Assessment – Clean Air Amendments – Continued
20
Results of Assessment – Clean Air Amendments – Continued
  • Individual Member Yea Votes Case Study:


    • League of Conservation Voters Yearly Ratings:
      • Ratings of Three Senators From Varying States and Political Parties:


        • Senator Pete V. Domenici (R-New Mexico)
        • Senator Frank H. Murkowski (R-Alaska)
        • Senator Daniel P. Moynihan (D-New York)

      • Ratings Based on Scale of 1% to 100%; 100% Being the Best Score a Member of Congress can Receive
21
Results of Assessment – Clean Air Amendments – Continued
  • U.S. Senator Pete V. Domenici (R-New Mexico)
    • 13% LCV Rating – Yea Vote
  •   -- Image courtesy of: http://bioguide.congress.gov/bioguide/photo/D/D000407.jpg


  • U.S. Senator Frank H. Murkowski (R-Alaska)
    • 20% LCV Rating – Yea Vote


    • -- Image courtesy of: http://bioguide.congress.gov/bioguide/photo/M/M001085.jpg


  • U.S. Senator Daniel P. Moynihan (D-New York)
    • 93% LCV Rating – Yea Vote


    • -- Image courtesy of: http://bioguide.congress.gov/bioguide/photo/M/M001054.jpg
22
Results of Assessment – Clean Air Amendments – Continued
  • Parochial Interests Case Study:
  • -- U.S. Senator Robert Byrd (D-West Virginia)


    • West Virginia Economy:


      • Surface Mining
      • Coal Mining
      • United Mine Workers

23
Results of Assessment – Clean Air Amendments – Continued
  • Special Interests and Political Action Committee’s (PACs) Case Study:


    • Estimated 154 PACs With a Stake in the Clean Air Amendments:
      • Sierra Club, American Lung Association, United Steel Workers, United Mine Workers, and National Wildlife Federation

    • Five Percent of All Money Raised by Members of Congress in 1989 (A Non-Election Year) Came From Those With an Interest in Securing the Bill’s Passage
      • Approximately $14,570 Per Member

24
The Future: The Direction of Bipartisanship Within Congress
  • Continued Gridlock and Partisanship Within Congress:


  • Presidency of William Jefferson Clinton (D) (1993 – 2001):
    • Antiquities Act of 1906 – Grand Staircase–Escalante National Monument (1.3 Million Acres of Utah Canyons Preserved)


    • Executive Order – 60 Million Acres of Federal Lands Preserved


25
The Future: The Direction of Bipartisanship Within Congress – Continued
  • 2000 Presidential Election: Bush vs. Gore
    • Environmental Policies of George W. Bush – 2003 Federal Budget and the Superfund Program


  • May 24th, 2001 – U.S. Senator James Jeffords (R-Vermont):
    • Temporary Change In Senate Landscape

  • Congressional Elections of 2004:
    • Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR):
      • Senate Amendment 168 – March 16th, 2005
        • 48 Republicans and 3 Democrat Nay Votes
        • 42 Democrats and 7 Republican Yea Votes
26
Conclusions
  • The Condition of the Environment Impacts All Congressional Districts and States, Spurring Members of Congress to Work Together for the Benefit of Their Districts


  • Roll Call Votes for Each Legislative Measure Revealed Bipartisanship Within Congress at a Period of Time When Federal Policy Was Shifting Under the Auspices of President Ronald Reagan (R) (1981 – 1989)
27
Thank You For Your Time, and I’ll Be Glad To Answer Any Questions You May Have